ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate how medical staff recognize and understand the nursing quality evaluation in robot-assisted arthroplasty so as to provide reference and evidence for construction of a nursing quality evaluation system for robot-assisted arthroplasty.Methods:The descriptive phenomenological research method was used for this qualitative research. From May to October, 2021, 6 doctors and 9 nurses from Operating Room, Laoshan Campus, Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University were interviewed in a semi-structured way about the nursing quality evaluation for robot-assisted arthroplasty. The data were sorted out by Nvivo12.0 qualitative analysis software, and the interview data were analyzed while the themes and topics refined according to the Colaizzi seven-step analysis of phenomenological data.Results:Three themes were extracted. ① The first theme was related to the quality evaluation of nursing structure, including 2 topics: nursing staff allocation and nursing quality management in operating room. ② The second theme was related to the quality evaluation of nursing process, including 4 topics: environment and facilities, nosocomial infection control, management of patients' operative safety, and specialized operative nursing. ③ The third theme was related to the quality evaluation of nursing outcomes, including 3 topics: satisfaction for operating room nursing, incidence of adverse events and patients' benefits.Conclusion:The themes and topics for nursing quality evaluation in robot-assisted arthroplasty extracted from the perspective of medical staff can provide reference for construction of a reasonable, scientific, efficient and comprehensive nursing quality evaluation index system.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To build a set of evidence-based quality of care indicators for patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA) through a comprehensive literature search to collect high quality evidence. And provide theoretical reference for KOA clinical nursing.Methods:Systematically and comprehensively searched the Chinese English databases and relevant guide websites to collect KOA related guidelines, standards of care, recommendations and quality indicators. The databases search time of Chinese was from construction to 2018, and English was from 2001 to 2018. According to JBI levels of evidence classification and recommend system to evaluate the quality of evidence. Then established the quality indicators draft guided by the theory of structure-process-outcome quality pattern. Finally,implemented 2 rounds of experts consultation using Delphi method to confirm the quality indicators set for KOA.Results:A total of 137 KOA quality indicators were included after the comprehensive retrieval. The final indicator system consisted of three factors: quality of structure, quality of process and outcome quality, including 11 first-level indicators, 31 second-level indicators and 64 third-level indicators.Conclusions:In this study, the quality indicators set of KOA could supply the theoretical basis for the evaluation of KOA nursing institutions and provide reference for the establishment of quality evaluation in other fields.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the scientific and objective quality management methods of ophthalmic nursing to improve the quality of ophthalmic clinical nursing. Methods According to the implemention details of review standards of tertiary special eye hospital (2011) and the management specification of clinical nursing of Guangdong province, combining with the characteristics of ophthalmic nursing to formulate the 21 indicators. The indicators had been applied in 12 wards to evaluate the nursing quality since 2013 each quarter. Using the Plato analysis method to analyze the data dynamically since 2013, then controlling and improving the nursing quality in view of the analysis result. The clinical nursing quality in the first half of 2013 was compared with the second half of 2013. Results The ophthalmic nursing indicators of 12 wards in the second half of 2013 were higher than the first half of 2013. Significant statistical difference was found in the implementation rate of periocular clean, cut fingernails preoperative, infusion system, identification, send medicine to the mouth, patients at high risk of falling drop of bed evaluation, wrist band awareness, patients′ satisfaction between two groups (χ2=4.115-12.308, P < 0.05 or 0.01). Conclusions Establishing and implementing the nursing quality evaluation indicators system of ophthalmology can evaluate the clinical nursing quality objectively and promote the continuous improvement of clinical nursing quality.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the establishment and implementation of nursing quality evaluation system in department of orthopedics. Methods Randomly 527 patients hospitalized in the department of orthopedics from December 2011 to December 2012 were selected and assigned into the control group, where a traditional evaluation system was used. Another 528 patients hospitalized from April 2013 to June 2014 as the observation group, where orthopedics specialist evaluation system was used. The two groups were compared in terms of hospital evaluation accuracy, observation accuracy, accuracy rate of specialist intervention complications, the qualified rate of nursing records and patient satisfaction. Result The hospital evaluation accuracy, observation accuracy, the accuracy rate of specialist intervention complications, the qualified rate of nursing records and patients satisfaction of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.01) and there was no incidence in two groups. Conclusion The establishment of orthopaedic nurse quality evaluation system can make up the shortage of traditional evaluation system and improve the quality of the orthopaedic nursing management.